Worldata
The Main Event Cost Per ClickVs. Cost Per Impression


The thrilla in Manila, the rumble in the jungle, the click vs. the impression. Many believe that today's match-up in the internet advertising arena will go down with the greatest of all time.

There is no argument that the web has been accepted by marketers as a targetable, measurable, and result-oriented medium. But the way we buy space within this medium has caused great debate.

At first glance, the tale of the tape seems fairly even: Two distinctly different pricing models that have landed on the desks of every online media buyer in the country. Which one will be victorious, and why?

And In The Impression Corner...

Weighing in on a CPM (cost per thousand) pricing model, this top contender has found great success in achieving any advertising objective. This fighter has been trained to adhere to all of the fundamental direct marketing principles of the past. After beating out the "flat monthly rate" model early on, this contender has enjoyed great success.

And In The Click Corner...

This contender's name says it all, cost-per-click. The advertiser pays based only on the number of clicks received. This brash pricing model seems like a sure thing. You want guaranteed results, you want clicks, then maybe this is the safe bet…or is it?

Come Out Fighting...
So you're the advertiser and you have $1,000 to spend on your online advertising program this month. Which model should you use?

Using the cost-per-impression model, you can buy 100,000 impressions. Using the cost-per-click model, you can buy 1000 clicks.

In the CPM pricing model, the overall cost is fixed, with the variable being our response rate.



In the cost-per-click model, the cost is directly proportional to the response rate.
The Cost-Per-Click Model Is On The Ropes...

The removal of the fixed cost regardless of the response rate is what eradicates the 'direct response' component when using the cost-per-click model.

Why?
Well, as a marketer, you would most likely want to test various creatives, or offers, throughout the program. Perhaps you are going to introduce a special premium, which is going to give a dramatic rise in your overall click-through rate.

Or, perhaps you are changing your sales model to perform a multi-staged sales effort. So you're giving away something for free in exchange for acquiring U.S. mail and/or email address information. In effect, with the cost-per-click model, you wind up being penalized for generating more responses.

The Knock-Out Punch...

While the cost-per-click model seems like the would-be winner, its attractiveness quickly wears off as the web-marketer jumps from 'amateur' to 'pro.' The web is an interactive, flexible direct-response medium, which operates most successfully within the cost-per-impression model.

Very similar to a direct mail program, the banner's creative is a hybrid combination of a direct mail piece's outer envelope, as well as the offer, with its localized 'call to action' being the click. This is not a new formula that needs testing. But rather, a successful formula that has made a successful transition into a new medium.

And The Winner, By Knockout...

Cost-per-impression!

     

Jay Schwedelson is corporate vice president of Worldata & WebConnect, where he oversees strategic direction and new business development. Under his leadership, Worldata & WebConnect has become the industry leader in permission Email marketing services and interactive advertising solutions.

Schwedelson is active in the Direct Marketing Association, where he serves as a member of the Internet Advisory Board Committee, Catalog Council and List & Database Council, and Marketing Technology and Internet Council. Jay also serves as an advisory board member for the Association of Interactive Media and Co-Chairs the Council for Responsible Email.
He continues his position as the subcommittee chairman for The DMA’s List Leaders EMail Committee.